Skip to main content

The Sad and Disturbing Tale of Dustin Thompson

Wow, it has been a while since I have written a blog entry. In fact, it has been a year, and I have a lot to fill you in on. But let's get down to what I covered via Tweets recently -- the insurrectionist Trial of Dustin Thompson, of Ohio, who entered into the Capitol Building on January 6, 2021, and stole first a bottle of booze and then a coat rack from the office of the Senate Parliamentarian.

Yesterday Thompson was convicted on all six criminal counts the Department of Justice had charged him with. There have now been about a half dozen January 6th insurrectionists (many call them rioters) who have been convicted following a trial. About 170 have already plead guilty.

Growing up in central Ohio, Thompson was originally a libertarian with moderate political views overall. According to his wife Sarah, the two met when they were both students at Ohio State University, Thompson had a double major of history and psychology. Sarah, a democrat, was a fashion merchandising major and went directly into working in the clothing retail industry.

Thompson graduated about a semester after Sarah did, and he worked for several years at a pawn shop. Then he was hired by his first exterminator job and worked there for a couple of years. And then he worked for a second extermination company. The two were married in January 2020.

During Trump's presidency, Sarah testified that her boyfriend and then husband moved further to the right politically. He apparently identified with Trump, who was often beset by criticism from the media, Democrats, and sometimes fellow Republicans. 

Three months after the two were married, Thompson was laid off. He testified that it was due to lack of business due to the burgeoning Covid-19 pandemic. It was March and his depression began. He felt isolated, being in quarantine, and spent hundreds of  hours trolling the Internet.

"It was then that I began latching onto conspiracy theories," he said in court. And he began to listen very closely to what his president, who he was now an ardent supporter of, was saying about the upcoming election.

Under Sarah's cross-examination on the witness stand she said she personally had no interest in going to the January 6th Save America Rally herself. However, "I knew what this rally was all about, and I supported his right to attend." She admitted she made the hotel reservation for Thompson at the Hampton Inn in Silver Spring, Maryland on the border of D.C. And, she said she has known Robert Lyon, Thompson's friend, for a number of years who travelled to the rally with him

Lyon who did not enter the U.S. Capitol on that inauspicious day, has already plead guilty to a couple charges in an agreement with the government a few weeks ago. He is scheduled to be sentenced in July.

Unlike his friend, Thompson did enter the Capitol Building and not just once, but twice. His first trip in, he stole a bottle of bourbon from the Senate Parliamentarian's Office. On his second trip to the same locale, he nicked a wood and brass coat rack. And, unlike Lyon, he chose to plead not guilty. 

In the evening of January 6th, as the two Ohio compadres considered how to get back to the Hampton Inn with their "trophy" coat rack (the liquor is not mentioned again -- as maybe it was consumed) they were confronted by a couple Capitol Hill Police officers, as they remained inside the restricted area on Capitol Hill. One of the prosecution's witnesses was Jennifer O'Neil, one of the two officers who confronted the pair shortly after 6:00pm. It was at this time that Thompson, as he admitted under cross-examination, fearing arrest for criminal behavior decided to flee on foot, leaving the trophy at the scene on South Capitol Street. Lyon did not flee.

A couple of weeks later, soon after he first tried to reach out to the FBI, effectively turning himself in (by then he had been identified), he chose to hire his attorney, Samuel Shamansky. 

The Senate Parliamentarian's office
on the evening of January 6, 2021.
Credit Newsweek.

On Thursday, April 14th, around 3:30pm the jury of six Black folks, four White folks, an Asian person, and a Hispanic person (a rather good demographic reflection of DC), and six women and six men returned with the verdict. After about two and a half hours of deliberation, the jury returned the ruling of guilty on all six counts. One of the five is a felony, obstruction of an official proceeding, and all but requires jail time.

Judge Reggie Walton, a Bush appointee, according to a seasoned D.C. lawyer friend of mine has a reputation of hard and long sentencing. He said he did not find any of Thompson's testimony to be honest or candid, and the way he spoke before the court "did not seem sincere."

After the jury cleared the room, Judge Walton spoke to Shamansky and Thompson, "I have some rather serious concerns... This was an insurgency, and our Democracy is in trouble."

Although the prosecution was fine with a release on bond pending sentencing, Judge Walton was not satisfied without that scenario, and ruled that Walton would await sentencing in D.C. Jail. A few words were quietly exchanged between client and counsellor, and then a bailiff approached, and the would-be insurrectionist emptied his pockets; a wallet, a pack of cigarettes, and a few other small items. He then removed his tie and his belt. And finally he turned around, and the court guard handcuffed his hands behind his back and led him to a door in the rear of the courtroom.

Of the approximately 190 who have been convicted and/or sentenced about 25 have been felonies, the rest have been misdemeanors. The harshest sentence yet, five years in prison, was doled out in December to Robert Palmer, a 54-year-old Florida man. He was the one seen in videos spraying police on January 6th with a fire extinguisher, and then once it was empty hurling it at them.

As he ordered Thompson to remain detained until his sentencing date, Judge Walton commented, "As my mother used to stay, 'you made me your bed and now you must lie in it.'"

"I am disturbed by how gullible so many people are, and I do think the former president is a charlatan," Judge Walton said. "But I find [Mr. Thompson's] behavior reprehensible."

The trial of Dustin Thompson was the first January 6th trial that employed a 'Trump Made Me Do It" defense strategy. Shamansky had vigorously tried to get the court to accept the former president to testify, but Judge Walton ultimately rejected the defense motion.

“I don’t think we want individuals to feel they can listen to anybody and go out and commit a criminal act and say, well, I was told I could do it,” Walton said.

Shamansky did not stop there, during his closing argument, he played the entire 70-minute speech Trump delivered the morning of January 6th. The jurors looked bored and shifted uncomfortably in their chairs, one even kept her eyes shut part of this time, and for the rest she was looking off to the side away from the screen. And Judge Walton during this replay of the former president's diatribe repeatedly looked at his smartphone.

Shamansky, however, during the trial repeatedly tried to place the blame on Trump. Oddly, it was as if the defense was attempting to entirely reframe the trial, as if Thompson were a witless victim, rather than the accused perpetrator.

On cross-examination, prosecutor William Dreher pressed Thompson to accept culpability for his own actions.

"You are not a child?" Dreher asked the Defendant.

"No."

"You are an adult?"

"Yes."

"This morning, you got yourself dressed, and got yourself to court?"

"Yes."

"You are aware of the concept of stealing, and you know it is illegal?"

"Yes."

A little later, "You fled from Officer O'Neil the evening of the 6th, because you were afraid you would be arrested because of what you did that day?"

"Yes."

Dustin Thompson and his lawyer Samuel
Shamansky enter the Prettyman Federal
Courthouse in Washington.
Credit CTV News.

That cross-examination, in addition to the wealth of evidence solidly proving that Thompson went into the capitol twice, stole the two items, and remained within a restricted area for hours was all stipulated (not contested as fact) to by defense sealed his conviction.

After the verdict was delivered by the jury foreperson, and the 38-year-old married man from Ohio was led out of the courtroom to a detainment cell, I tried to imagine his life before he came to D.C. in January 2021, and what his life would be like after his conviction. 

Like so many pulled into Trump's traitorous Big Lie, Alex Jones' fantastical delusions, or Q Anon's wildly grandiose and out of this world conspiracies -- or all three -- what leads individuals, such as Dustin Thompson, to commit criminal acts against their better judgment as adults, like they did on January 6, 2021? The answer is not clear to me, but luckily this defense of escaping culpability by blaming a dastardly and powerful authority figure utterly failed on April 14, 2022.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Guantanamo put on trial -- May 27th

In eight days, Eve Tetaz, a 76-year old retired D.C. public schoolteacher, will enter a courthouse in Washington, D.C. and engage in the legal debate over the fate of America's detention facilities at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. The name of Noor Muhammad has never appeared in an American criminal court. On May 27th, Tetaz will change that. On that day, she will appear at the Washington, D.C. Superior Court as Noor Muhammad. Tetaz was arrested, along with 78 others, at the U.S. Supreme Court on January 11, 2008, protesting the denial of habeas rights to and the torture of inmates at Guantanamo. Like her fellow protestors, Tetaz took the name of an inmate during her arrest. ( See the January 13 Washington Post article "Activists Pose as Guantanamo Prisoners" ) Tetaz says she felt compelled to participate in the protest at the Supreme Court because detainees are being tortured at Guantanamo. "Torture is a terrible crime and sin against humanity," she said. Thirty-four

Sheehan to challenge Pelosi

I was there the day about three weeks ago when Cindy announced she was running against Pelosi. It was outside of Rep. John Conyers'office. I think change is in the air, and all politics is local. The San Fran area is perhaps the most staunchly progressive in the whole country. Tomorrow morning I will be dropping a check for Cindy's campaign in the mail. Peace activist seeks SF-area House seat Associated Press report Citing her son as inspiration, a tearful Cindy Sheehan announced her candidacy Thursday for the U.S. House of Representatives. The anti-war activist, a former resident of Vacaville, said she will run as an independent against House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who has represented San Francisco in Congress since 1987. "The country is ripe for a change," said Sheehan, who spoke at a news conference in San Francisco, with her slain son's photograph attached to the podium. "It's going to start right here and right now." Sheehan's 24-year-old son

William Thomas Dies

William Thomas, dedicated peace and anti-nuke activist, passed away Friday morning at home. He was co-pilot of the 24-hour seven-day a week vigil at the White House for 27 years. He is survived by his wife Ellen and vigil co-pilot Concepcion. I remember Thomas from my high school years years early in on his vigil. Millions of people from hundred of countries visited Thomas as he kept vigiling, warning them of the dangers of nuclear holocaust and the ravages of war. He will be greatly missed by the peace and justice movement. An excerpt from an article in The Washington Post by David Montgomery, published a couple years ago: WASHINGTON — William Thomas first introduced fanny to brick on the White House sidewalk on June 3, 1981. His sign said, "Wanted: Wisdom and Honesty." He's been there ever since, still squatting, still wanting. A few months after he began, he was joined by Concepcion Picciotto, who has remained similarly steadfast. War is not over, but the peace protest